Chapter 3 (Part 2): Factors of Locality — Edaphic & Biotic Factors
Chapter 3 – Factors of Locality
Learning Overview
Soil properties, soil profile, soil water, humus, parent rock, and the influence of living organisms on forest vegetation.
This chapter explains how soil conditions and living organisms influence the growth, distribution, regeneration and development of forest vegetation.
Edaphic factors Soil profile Soil water Parent rock Biotic factors Forest ecology1. Key Concepts and Definitions
Edaphic Factors
Definitions of Soil
- Pedological definition: Soil is a natural body consisting of mineral and organic constituents, differentiated into horizons.
- Wilde: Forest soil is the product of interactions among parent material, climate, organisms, topography and time under forest conditions.
- Champion and Seth: Soil is a dynamic natural body that supports plant growth and undergoes continuous changes through physical, chemical and biological processes.
Other Important Terms
| Term | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Catena | A sequence of soils occurring along a slope under the influence of topographic conditions. |
| Biotic factors | Influences of living organisms on vegetation and forest ecosystems. |
| Competition | Interaction among organisms for limited resources such as light, water, nutrients and space. |
| Parasite | An organism that obtains nourishment from another living organism (host). |
| Epiphyte | A plant growing on another plant for physical support without necessarily obtaining food from it. |
| Liana | A woody climbing plant that uses other plants or structures for support. |
| Habitat | The natural environment in which an organism lives. |
2. Soil Formation and Soil Dynamics
Agencies of Soil Formation
Soil formation is influenced by active and passive agencies.
- Climate
- Biological organisms
- Parent rock/material
- Topography
- Time
Active = Climate + Organisms
Passive = Parent material + Topography + Time
Weathering of Rocks
Breakdown of rocks into smaller fragments without changing their chemical composition.
Examples: temperature changes, frost action and mechanical disintegration.
Decomposition and alteration of minerals through chemical reactions.
Examples: oxidation, hydration, hydrolysis and carbonation.
Parent Rock and Species Distribution
Parent material influences soil texture, mineral composition, nutrient availability and vegetation distribution.
| Parent rock / soil condition | Species association / observation |
|---|---|
| Quartzite | Chir pine is associated with quartzitic formations. |
| Mica schist | Blue pine is associated with mica schist. |
| Lime-rich rocks | Teak is associated with lime-rich geological formations. |
| Lateritic soils | Teak generally avoids lateritic soils; Xylia xylocarpa and Cleistanthus collinus are associated with lateritic conditions. |
| Black cotton soils | Teak is reported to avoid black cotton soils. |
| Deccan trap | Sal is reported absent from Deccan trap formations. |
| Quartzite and gneiss | Red Sanders is associated with quartzite and is reported not to occur on adjoining gneiss. |
- Chir – Quartzite
- Blue pine – Mica schist
- Teak – Lime-rich rocks
- Red Sanders – Quartzite
3. Soil Profile and Soil Horizons
A soil profile represents the vertical section of soil showing different horizons from the surface down to the underlying parent material or bedrock.
Description of Soil Horizons
| Horizon | Description |
|---|---|
| A₀₀ | Surface litter layer consisting mainly of undecomposed plant material. |
| A₀ | Organic layer containing humus; includes fermentation and humification layers (F and H). |
| A | Eluviation zone, where materials are removed by downward movement of water. |
| A₁ | Mineral horizon mixed with organic matter. |
| A₂ | Zone of maximum eluviation and depletion of certain materials. |
| A₃ | Transitional horizon between A and B. |
| B | Illuviation zone, where materials transported from upper horizons accumulate. |
| C | Weathered parent material. |
| D | Underlying bedrock. |
| G | Gley horizon associated with waterlogging and reducing conditions. |
“All Active Boys Can Dance”
A₀₀ → A₀ → A → B → C → D
Hardpans
| Hardpan | Major constituent / description |
|---|---|
| Ortstein | Iron- and organic-matter cemented layer. |
| Lateritic iron pan | Iron-rich hardened layer. |
| Silican pan | Hardened layer associated with silica accumulation. |
| Kankar pan | Calcium carbonate-rich hardened layer. |
4. Soil Water and Soil Moisture
pF Value
Formula: pF = log₁₀(h)
Where h = suction head in centimetres of water.
Classification of Soil Water According to pF
| Soil water category | pF range | Availability to plants |
|---|---|---|
| Gravitational water | Below 2.7 | Moves downward under gravity; generally not retained for long. |
| Capillary water | 2.7–4.5 | Main source of water available to plants. |
| Hygroscopic water | Above 4.5 | Held tightly by soil particles and unavailable to plants. |
Groundwater
- Groundwater can influence vegetation where the water table is relatively shallow.
- A water table at approximately 5–10 m may influence vegetation depending on rooting depth and soil conditions.
Available Water Capacity
- Wilting coefficient is generally lowest in sandy soils.
- Wilting coefficient is generally highest in clay soils.
- Available water is generally maximum in loamy soils.
- Sand: Lowest wilting coefficient.
- Clay: Highest wilting coefficient.
- Loam: Maximum available water.
5. Soil Texture and Soil Humus
Soil Texture Classification (ISSS)
| Soil particle | Particle size (mm) |
|---|---|
| Clay | Less than 0.002 |
| Silt | 0.002–0.02 |
| Fine sand | 0.02–0.2 |
| Coarse sand | 0.2–2.0 |
| Gravel | Greater than 2.0 |
Remember the increasing order:
Clay → Silt → Fine sand → Coarse sand → Gravel
Types of Humus
| Humus type | Characteristics |
|---|---|
| Mull | Well-decomposed organic matter, generally associated with biologically active soils and good mixing of organic matter with mineral soil. |
| Mor | Raw or poorly decomposed organic matter, generally associated with acidic conditions and slower decomposition. |
| Acid/Sour humus | Acidic humus associated with slow decomposition and accumulation of organic matter. |
Litter Production
Approximately 25 tonnes/ha
Approximately 10 tonnes/ha
Rain forest = 25; Deciduous forest = 10 tonnes/ha.
6. Soil Chemical Properties
Soil pH and Tree Species
| Species / condition | pH range / response |
|---|---|
| Sal | 4.5–5.5 |
| Teak | 6.5–7.6 |
| Alkali-tolerant species | Can tolerate comparatively alkaline soil conditions. |
Soil pH and Microbial Activity
- Nitrifying organisms are inhibited at soil pH below 5.5.
- Damping-off disease is reported to be controlled under soil conditions of pH 5.5 or below.
Soil C:N Ratio
The carbon-to-nitrogen ratio influences the decomposition of organic matter and nitrogen availability.
Nitrification
Nitrogen immobilisation
| C:N ratio | Effect |
|---|---|
| ≤ 17:1 | Favourable for nitrification. |
| Above 33:1 | Nitrogen immobilisation. |
| 10:1 | Ideal ratio. |
- 17 or less: Nitrification.
- Above 33: Immobilisation.
- 10:1: Ideal ratio.
Sal Seedling Mortality
7. Biotic Factors Affecting Forest Vegetation
Biotic factors include the influence of plants, animals, insects, microorganisms and human activities on forest vegetation.
7.1 Parasitic Plants
Parasitic plants obtain some or all of their nourishment from host plants.
| Type | Examples | Important feature |
|---|---|---|
| Total stem parasite | Cuscuta reflexa, Cassytha filiformis | Depend on the host for their nourishment. |
| Partial stem parasite | Loranthus longiflorus, Viscum, Arceuthobium minutissimum | Partially depend on the host. |
| Root hemiparasite | Sandalwood (Santalum album) | Root parasite that obtains nutrients through host-root connections. |
- Total stem: Cuscuta and Cassytha.
- Partial stem: Loranthus, Viscum and Arceuthobium.
- Root: Sandalwood.
7.2 Weeds
Invasive weed that competes with forest vegetation and may interfere with natural regeneration.
Weed that can compete with forest vegetation and affect regeneration.
7.3 Insect Pests
| Host tree | Insect pest | Type of damage |
|---|---|---|
| Sal | Hoplocerambyx spinicornis | Sal borer. |
| Teak | Hapalia machaeralis | Teak defoliator. |
| Teak | Hyblaea puera | Teak skeletonizer. |
| Teak / Meliaceae | Hypsipyla robusta | Shoot borer. |
“Machaeralis Defoliates, Puera Skeletonizes.”
- Hapalia machaeralis – Defoliator.
- Hyblaea puera – Skeletonizer.
- Hypsipyla robusta – Shoot borer.
7.4 Damage by Wild Animals
| Animal | Damage / affected species |
|---|---|
| Monkeys and langurs | Pull out Chir pine seedlings. |
| Porcupines | Damage bamboo, Khair and Semal. |
| Bears | Strip bark from Deodar, Spruce and Blue pine. |
- Monkey/Langur: Chir seedlings.
- Porcupine: Bamboo, Khair and Semal.
- Bear: Bark stripping of Deodar, Spruce and Blue pine.
7.5 Forest Fire
- Can be beneficial under suitable management.
- May help in prescribed burning and fuel management.
- Damages forest vegetation.
- Can destroy regeneration and soil organic matter.
- May cause ecological and economic losses.
7.6 Grazing and Browsing
- Light and controlled grazing may be beneficial under suitable conditions.
- Heavy grazing damages vegetation and soil.
- Goats and camels can cause considerable browsing damage.
- Goats are considered the most destructive browsing animals.
8. Important Scientific Names
| Common name / identification | Scientific name |
|---|---|
| Sal borer | Hoplocerambyx spinicornis |
| Teak defoliator | Hapalia machaeralis |
| Teak skeletonizer | Hyblaea puera |
| Shoot borer | Hypsipyla robusta |
| Root hemiparasite | Santalum album |
| Partial stem parasite | Arceuthobium minutissimum |
| Invasive weed | Lantana camara |
| Invasive weed | Eupatorium odoratum |
| Woody climber / liana | Bauhinia vahlii |
9. Important One-Liners for Competitive Examinations
- Chir pine is associated with quartzite.
- Blue pine is associated with mica schist.
- Teak is associated with lime-rich rocks.
- Red Sanders is associated with quartzite.
- Top height is based on the 250 largest trees per hectare.
- pF value is the logarithm of soil-water suction head expressed in centimetres.
- Capillary water occurs within the pF range of 2.7–4.5.
- Sal seedling mortality is associated with a soil-air CO₂/O₂ ratio of 2.8.
- Nitrifying organisms are inhibited at pH below 5.5.
- Damping-off is controlled at soil pH 5.5 or below.
- C:N ratio above 33:1 results in nitrogen immobilisation.
- Ideal C:N ratio: 10:1.
- Litter production in tropical rain forests is approximately 25 tonnes/ha.
- Litter production in tropical deciduous forests is approximately 10 tonnes/ha.
- Controlled burning may be beneficial under suitable management.
- Goats are considered the most destructive browsing animals.
10. Quick Revision – Must Remember
| Topic | Important fact |
|---|---|
| Soil formation | Active: climate and organisms; Passive: parent rock, topography and time. |
| Soil profile | A₀₀ → A₀ → A → B → C → D. |
| Eluviation | A horizon. |
| Illuviation | B horizon. |
| Weathered parent material | C horizon. |
| Capillary water | pF 2.7–4.5. |
| Available water | Maximum in loamy soils. |
| Clay particle | Less than 0.002 mm. |
| Sal soil pH | 4.5–5.5. |
| Teak soil pH | 6.5–7.6. |
| High C:N ratio | Above 33:1 – nitrogen immobilisation. |
| Sal borer | Hoplocerambyx spinicornis. |
| Teak defoliator | Hapalia machaeralis. |
| Teak skeletonizer | Hyblaea puera. |
| Sandalwood | Root hemiparasite. |
11. Interactive Practice Quiz
15 questions. Tap an option to see the correct answer and explanation straight away, then go to the next question.
Comments
Post a Comment